Overview
What is BWise?
BWise is an Governance, Risk Management, and Compliance (GRC) platform formerly owned and supported by Nasdaq, acquired by SAI Global in April 2019.
BWise - The peaks and valleys of our GRC journey
Pricing
What is BWise?
BWise is an Governance, Risk Management, and Compliance (GRC) platform formerly owned and supported by Nasdaq, acquired by SAI Global in April 2019.
Entry-level set up fee?
- No setup fee
Offerings
- Free Trial
- Free/Freemium Version
- Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Would you like us to let the vendor know that you want pricing?
6 people also want pricing
Alternatives Pricing
What is ManageEngine ADAudit Plus?
ADAudit Plus offers real-time monitoring, user and entity behaviour analytics, and change audit reports that helps users keep AD and IT infrastructure secure and compliant.Track all changes to Windows AD objects including users, groups, computers, GPOs, and OUs.Achieve hybrid AD monitoring with a…
What is Egnyte?
Egnyte provides a unified content security and governance solution for collaboration, data security, compliance, and threat detection for multicloud businesses. More than 16,000 organizations trust Egnyte to reduce risks and IT complexity, prevent ransomware and IP theft, and boost employee…
Product Details
- About
- Tech Details
What is BWise?
BWise Technical Details
Operating Systems | Unspecified |
---|---|
Mobile Application | No |
Comparisons
Compare with
Reviews and Ratings
(6)Attribute Ratings
Reviews
(1-2 of 2)BWise GRC Implementation Review
BWise is integrated with TeamMate audit tracking, for internal audit testing and annual compliance testing.
BWise is used for testing across the enterprise, giving management a view into the control effectiveness, across the company, and across compliance initiatives.
- Bwise is very customizable to accommodate multiple compliance initiatives, across the enterprise.
- Integration with TeamMate, made tracking audit testing and results easy to stay on top of.
- Being able to map controls, and test once, and report control effectiveness for multiple initiatives was important.
- Integration with SAP for continuous control monitoring.
- Control mapping to standards: ISO; COSO; COBIT; HIPAA; SP800_53 (NIST); FedRAMP; PCI_DSS; BITS; GAAP; AICPA; BSI; CCM; COPPA; CSA
- Surveys.
SAP GRC Process control may be better suited for an SAP environment.
Oracle GRC may be better suited for an Oracle environment.
Overall, BWise is a very cost effective, and flexible solution.
- Common repository of GRC items
- 90%9.0
- Risk management
- 90%9.0
- Integration with Corporate Performance Management (CPM) systems
- 70%7.0
- GRC policy management
- 90%9.0
- Incident management
- 90%9.0
- BWise was the most cost effective, and flexible solution evaluated, and eventually implemented.
- BWise is a great repository for controls, and for managing GRC compliance.
- BWise handled mapping multiple compliance initiatives to the master controls very well.
- BWise integrated with TeamMate for testing controls very well.
- Control compliance.
- Control testing.
- Control remediation tracking.
- Management awareness.
- Integrating with TeamMate for control testing, tracking, remediation.
- Management awareness.
- Management Self-testing.
- Continuous control monitoring.
- Managing additional compliance initiatives.
- HR Employee surveys.
- Price
- Product Features
- Product Usability
- Product Reputation
- Positive Sales Experience with the Vendor
- Third-party Reviews
- Vendor implemented
- Implemented in-house
- Professional services company
We used Deloitte as a consultant, to provide project management, and implementation expertise for our custom, and complex environment.
We implemented multiple compliance initiatives (SOX; PCI; IT General controls; Procurement; Audit; Management Self-testing, HR Employee Surveys; Questionnaires; and other Surveys.
Multiple companies, and multiple locations across the enterprise.
The project was very complex, with defining the master data, and mapping controls to multiple compliance initiatives, for multiple companies, in multiple locations. We also performed a custom integration with TeamMate, for Audit integration, testing, tracking, reporting, and remediation.
We brought together a Steering committee, with the project sponsors, and the Business and Process owners represented.
Having a consultant act as the PMO helped objectivity, and communicating clearly how competing objectives, requirements, and concerns were being addressed.
- Competing business objectives was the most significant issue encountered.
- Project management, and managing the timeline was the next significant issue.
- Customization of the complex environment, and implementation was an issue.
- Implementing multiple compliance initiatives at once was a challenge, but considered necessary to move to one tool set.
We implemented multiple compliance initiatives, across multiple companies, across a multinational enterprise.
We also performed a custom integration with TeamMate, for audit control testing, tracking, and reporting.
- Managing the Master control list.
- Managing multiple compliance initiatives.
- Mapping controls to the multiple compliance initiatives, multiple companies, and many locations.
- Dashboards, and reporting results.
- Managing and restricting views across lines of business, companies, locations, and compliance initiatives.
- Custom integration with audit tools like TeamMate, but we completed an effective integration.
- Mapping controls to standards, COSO, COBIT, ISO, HIPAA, PCI, NIST.
- Most standard GRC requirements were managed pretty well.
BWise - The peaks and valleys of our GRC journey
- Great reporting tool (uses SAP Business Objects). It is quite flexible on types of reports that can be created and supported. Also the reporting consultants are very competent and nice.
- Highly customizable solution: almost everything can be tailored to an organization's needs, assessments, audits, issues, recommendations, tasks, etc. However, there's a trade-off between customization and the integration of different areas of the organization.
- Increases visibility and efficiency in the organization. BWise offers centralized repositories (catalogs) that can be easily accessed and used by everyone in the organization (e.g. Process catalog, Policies and Procedures catalog, Risks, Controls, Laws catalogs, etc.). Also, the application allows findings on controls tested by Audit to be automatically reflected in controls monitored by SOX for example, without the need for SOX to retest them. So one area can leverage on the work of other areas increasing operational efficiency.
- Increases integration and avoids silos. By choosing the correct design (e.g. Risk Workshops instead of Open Assessments), one area can see and benefit from another areas' work. An example was mentioned above; another would be Operational Risk area considering the results of Business Continuity, Vendor Management, Info Security, etc. assessments when carrying out theirs. Additionally, processes can be integrated: when contracting a new vendor for instance, one can include questions about data confidentiality and usage of models in the Vendor risk assessment. Answers to these could then trigger Info Sec / Model Risk assessments.
- Increases accountability. Application provides full audit/change log with the type of change, name of executor, and date of change.
- Easier follow-up. BWise sends automatic emails with reminders to the people required to take action on an issue, assessment, etc.
- Internal Quality Check. I think this is the most prominent area BWise should improve on. Currently they lack internal Quality Check/Review.
- Internal dialogue among employees. When various consultants are involved in the same project, their communication and updating each-other could be a bit stronger.
- Inclusion of content. The application could benefit considerably from including some out-of-the-box content (e.g. COSO principles, Risk catalogs, etc.).
- Risk Workshop functionality. This is one of the main functionalities that allows integration among different areas of an organization. However, it comes pretty much "take it or leave it"; it's almost not customizable.
- Consultants' transparency. When an organization requests a particular design of the application or solicits changes to such design, it would be great if BWise consultants could always and more thoroughly advise on the implications of these changes, design to the organization's strategic objectives and ultimate target.
- Product features. Application has room for improving its programming, e.g. providing internal checks when creating/answering an issue/finding (for instance, remedy implementation date cannot be before the recommendation response date or the recommendation creation date). Another example would be the possibility of automatic periodic followup (e.g. every 1 month until completion).
- Who will be using the tool?
- How mature is our organization in the areas/processes that will fall in scope?
- Are our areas averse to change?
- How flexible and prone are our areas to modify their way of doing business and processes/procedures to accommodate BWise?
- After implementation, who and how will perform application maintenance and change management (e.g. how easy will it be to update user privileges, central catalogs, assessment configurations, etc).
- Common repository of GRC items
- 80%8.0
- Risk management
- 60%6.0
- GRC policy management
- 80%8.0
- Incident management
- 90%9.0
- Increased employee efficiency especially considering incident management and follow up.
- Increased visibility and senior management information/awareness.
- Increased employee accountability.
- Reduction of silos.